[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <467178D3.6010204@grupopie.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:20:19 +0100
From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@...popie.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@....de>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Multiple authors == need permission from each author with enough
>>> contributions to that file to make the contributions in question
>>> copyrightable.
>>>
>>> And in my case (and case of gregkh, and...) that would be considerably
>>> more than a couple of files. Really.
>> I would expect that if you contribute to a file that explicitely says
>> "GPL v2 or later" and you do not change that wording then you agree
>> GPL v2 or later for that particular contribution. So for example
>> drivers/net/plip.c could be changed to GPL v3 even though you
>> contributed to it.
>
> After you exclude such cases it's still more than a couple of files...
FWIW,
$ find -name "*.c" | xargs grep "any later version" | wc -l
3138
$ find -name "*.c" | wc -l
9482
Watching the output of the first grep without "wc -l" shows that,
although it is not 100% accurate, it is still ok just to get a rough
estimate.
So yes, ~6300 files are definitely more than a couple ;)
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
"God is love. Love is blind. Ray Charles is blind. Ray Charles is God."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists