[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070614181210.GA11421@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:12:10 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
linux-stable <stable@...nel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > I think it looks way too big.
>
> Agreed (otherwise I would have submitted the patches already).
>
> > If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable.
>
> It may be possible to get rid of the couple of unrelated ones (sd printing,
> SCSI constants). These were required for the real patches to be able to
> build, but it would probably be easy to modify the real patches to build
> against kernels without those otherwise unrelated patches.
>
> > Are there reported bugs that this patchset fixes?
>
> Yes, but they are not regressions - libata has never done this right until
> now.
>
> Here are a few:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174373
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7674
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7838
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.17/+bug/67810
Ok, if people want to post some smaller patches to the stable team,
we'll be glad to consider them.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists