| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:22:29 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: "Neshama Parhoti" <pneshama@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 > So how come they can so easily move to GPLv3 ? > Don't they have to have permission from all of those contributors (many > of which are Linux companies and distributors who might prefer staying > at GPLv2) ? The FSF uses copyright assignments to ensure the entire project is under FSF control. Linux does not - there are benefits to both approaches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists