[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4671B5BB.2000203@wpkg.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:40:11 +0200
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext2 on flash memory
Jan Knutar wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007 16:48, DervishD wrote:
>> But anyway the memory should last long. Even cheap flash memories
>> with poor wear leveling (if any at all) usually long last. Given that
>> I won't be writing continuously, wear shouldn't be a problem. I'm
>> going to use this as a backup copy of my home. Of course, I can use a
>> tarball too...
>
> I did a test on my kingston datatraveler recently, I didn't expect it to
> survive, but it did. I put reiserfs on it, and copied 394M of data in
> 200,000 files to it. Reiserfs was sloooow at writing, the device was
> probably doing alot of work. ext2 was about 10X faster, but there was
> hardly any free space left at all at the end :)
>
> Considering it surived ReiserFS, I suspect it would last ages with ext2,
> especially for your backup purposes.
I have a couple of years old USB stick, which was used for swap, and for
compiling stuff natively on some small mipsel devices, and generally
moving files back and forth a lot (ext3 + noatime).
Still, it works just fine.
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists