[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070615005501.0503daeb@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:55:01 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
"Daniel Hazelton" <dhazelton@...er.net>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"debian developer" <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
"Tarkan Erimer" <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
> B) There are actually manufacturers who would be happy with your straw man.
> Lots of companies in the far east produce products that infringe on patents
> from 30 different competitors, and rather than try to license everything
> (which isn't even always possible) they spin off a shell company (or nested
> series thereof), design and manufacture a product, sell a production run of
> them into the distribution channel, and then dissolve the shell company
> before the inventory hits retailers. But the time anybody is in a position
This isn't just done for IPR, in fact in many fields IPR is a non-issue.
The primary reason for this practice is to render US health and safety
regulation irrelevant and to prevent class action suits if/when your
device kills someone.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists