linux-kernel - Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200706151137.01053.bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:36:54 +0200
From:	Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@....de>
To:	davids@...master.com
Cc:	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:47, David Schwartz wrote:
> The GPL does not require it to be easy in fact to modify the piece of
> software.

Yes it does, section 3: "The source code for a work means the preferred form 
of the work for making modifications to it." It then even lists that you 
need to provide all the scripts and stuff you use to make it easy for you.

Come on, *READ* the GPL, before you argue.

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped