[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46726793.1020206@dgreaves.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:18:59 +0100
From: David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>
To: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc: Michael Gerdau <mgd@...hnosis.de>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
>> Now for a different PoV:
>> Do I think Tivoisation is bad for the community ?
>> Of course I think it is but your mileage may vary.
>
> And I happen to agree with you. What I disagree with is taking steps to
> make "bad == illegal". I also have a problem with doing things that force my
> viewpoint on other people.
Surely it's more:
bad == go away and don't use future improvements to our software anymore please.
??
*If* you think it's bad (Linus doesn't as far as the kernel goes) then isn't it
reasonable to exclude 'bad for the community' from the community?
This isn't retroactive - they can continue to use any V2 software they had, they
wouldn't be able to use V3 developments.
That seems to me to be a very, very reasonable thing to do (and very much *not*
bad == illegal IMHO)
David
PS well, I was just seeing if anyone had fixed my libata/md bug yet but this
seemed more interesting.
PPS and Tejun has, I'm off...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists