[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070614170144.GD9442@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:01:44 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>,
Tetsuo Handa <from-lsm@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation,pathname matching
Hi!
> I also don't care about the details of how it gets
> implemented, but when the AA people have a working
> implementation, and the SELinux people are strongly
> opposed to the concept, I don't see any advantage in
Actually, SELinux people 'liked' the concept -- they are willing to
extend SELinux to handle new files better. And not only SELinux people
are opposed to AA.
> if the SELinux people had responded to the announcement
> of AA with "that's a nice idea, if we add these snippits
> from your code to SELinux then we can do the same thing"
> it would be a very different story.
It was something like 'is there description of AA security model? We'd
like to take a look if we can do that within SELinux'. I tried to
forward them pdf, but it was more AA implementation description (not
AA model description) so it was probably not helpful.
So yes, SELinux people want to help.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists