[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070615124034.GH9442@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:40:35 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, gregkh@...e.de, mtk-manpages@....net,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
"lf_kernel_messages@...ux-foundation.org"
<lf_kernel_messages@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
Hi!
> > Your proposal is similar to one I made to some Japanese developers
> > earlier this year. I was more modest, proposing that we
> >
> > - add an enhanced printk
> >
> > xxprintk(msgid, KERN_ERR "some text %d\n", some_number);
> Maybe a stupid idea but why do we want to assign these numbers by hand?
> I can imagine it could introduce collisions when merging tons of patches
> with new messages... Wouldn't it be better to compute say, 8-byte hash
> from the message and use it as it's identifier? We could do this
Why hashes? Just key it off full message, and treat it like normal
translation problem.
'lp%d: on fire' -> 'your printer failed basic tests, you should check
cabling'.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists