[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1181911628.25228.483.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:47:08 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > That is broken on all non-x86 architectures,
> It cannot be broken, it just might be somewhat slower
No, Andi. It's broken.
We're speaking of a 32-bit ioctl compat routine. I would say it's more
than 'convention' that the structure used by the compat_ioctl routine
actually matches the 'real' structure as it gets laid out on the 32-bit
architecture.
The 'real' structure as used by the 32-bit userspace does not have the
'packed' attribute. Thus the u64 member of the structure is aligned to 8
bytes on _all_ relevant 32-bit architectures except for i386.
By adding 'packed' in the compat_ioctl routine, you cause it to expect a
structure which does not match what userspace is using, for all non-x86
architectures. That's kind of not very compatible. I call that 'broken'.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists