linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46728A15.5050905@sw.ru>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:46:13 +0400
From:	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, efault@....de,
	kernel@...ivas.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pwil3058@...pond.net.au,
	tingy@...umass.edu, tong.n.li@...el.com, wli@...omorphy.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.adamushko@...il.com,
	balbir@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> i'd still like to hear back from Kirill & co whether this framework is 
> flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too.

My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look ready/suitable.
We need to have a working SMP version before it will be clear
whether the whole approach is good and works correct on variety of load patterns.

Thanks,
Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/