[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070615130000.GI9442@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:00:01 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, takedakn@...data.co.jp,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO 5/9] Memory and pathname management functions.
Hi!
> >>We limit the maximum length of any string data (such as
> >>domainname and pathnames) to TOMOYO_MAX_PATHNAME_LEN
> >>(which is 4000) bytes to fit within a single page.
> >>
> >>Userland programs can obtain the amount of RAM
> >>currently
> >>used by TOMOYO from /proc interface.
> >
> >Same NACK for this as for AppArmor, on exactly the same
> >grounds.
> >Please stop wasting your time on pathname-based
> >non-solutions.
>
> This issue is a very very small wart on an otherwise
> fine idea.
> It's really not worth getting bothered by. Truth is, big
> giant
> pathnames break lots of stuff already, both kernel and
> userspace.
> Just look in /proc for some nice juicy kernel breakage:
> cwd, exe, fd/*, maps, mounts, mountstats, root, smaps
Well, but we should be fixing that, not adding more. And /proc is
info-only, while this is security related code.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists