| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <d120d5000706150603w2f70431ei5a2ae461ac3d0ff4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:03:27 -0400 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> To: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: "Bernd Paysan" <bernd.paysan@....de>, "Alexandre Oliva" <aoliva@...hat.com>, "Paulo Marques" <pmarques@...popie.com>, "Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>, "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 On 6/15/07, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > > No, you do receive the license from the person or entity you received > > the program. You have an _option_ to go to the original author and get > > copy of original code with original license (or maybe other license). > > You receive the licence from the original author. The GPL contains no > text allowing a third party to grant new licences. > GPL itself does not. But the author(s) may when they specify "any later version", "dual GPL/BSD", etc. In this case (IMHO) distributor in fact relicenses the code and may reduce license to sipmply BSD or simply GPL, or "GPL v3 from now on". To "restore" license you would need to go upstream and get the code from there. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists