linux-kernel - Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:35:22 -0300
From:	"Renato S. Yamane" <renatoyamane@...dic.com.br>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:42:50 +0530
>> How much better performance i will get?
> 
> How long is a piece of string. Given you don't give any hardware info,
> any info on the applications run or on the network and capacity expected
> its a bit hard to guess really.

Detail: I think that is a good idea if hard-users (as kernel developers) 
had a local to host yours .config file, specifying hadware.

E.g. I have a laptop Toshiba M45-S355 (with ReiserFS) and don't have 
experience to choose what I can remove from kernel (or compile as 
module/built-in).

So, is a great idea use pre-config file to compile a new kernel with 
best options.

My .config file (2.6.21.1) and lspci is attached.

Best regards,
Renato S. Yamane

Download attachment "lspci.txt" of type "plain/text" (2122 bytes)

Download attachment "config_2.6.21.1.txt" of type "plain/text" (59928 bytes)