linux-kernel - Re: UML - Compilation problem on 2.6.22-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070615145740.GA6253@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:57:40 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Arun Raghavan <arunsr@....iitk.ac.in>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UML - Compilation problem on 2.6.22-rc4

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:53:55AM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> Hello,
> I ran into some compilations problems with UML on the 2.6.22-rc4 kernel.
> The problem turns up because "paravirt.h" is included in a couple of
> headers in asm-i386 without being protected by a "#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT".
> 
> I've attached a patch to fix this (i.e. UML compiles and runs fine for
> me with these changes). I don't know if this is sufficient for all cases
> though (most other uses of the #ifdef include a lengthy #else).

Thanks, I have this fixed by making an asm-um/paravirt.h instead.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/