[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706151724.17094.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:24:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: vtaras@...nvz.org
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dev@...ru, devel@...nvz.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nataliep@...gle.com, vvs@...ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures
On Friday 15 June 2007, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> I just noticed that we can not avoid the addition of packed attribute.
> Look, for example:
>
> struct if_dqblk {
> __u64 dqb_bhardlimit;
> __u64 dqb_bsoftlimit;
> __u64 dqb_curspace;
> __u64 dqb_ihardlimit;
> __u64 dqb_isoftlimit;
> __u64 dqb_curinodes;
> __u64 dqb_btime;
> __u64 dqb_itime;
> __u32 dqb_valid;
> };
>
> sizeof(if_dqblk) = 0x48
> On 32 bit: 0x44
>
> If I replace __u64/__u32 with compat equivalents - it will not help!
> alligned attribute can _only_ _increase_ the size of structure, but not
> decrease it.
No, the gcc documentation isn't quite clear there, see the discussion about
compat_u64 and compat_s64 types. It actually does the right thing when
you use 'typedef __u64 __attribute__((aligned(64))) compat_64', as my
patch does.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists