[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26501.192.54.193.51.1181908434.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:53:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@...oste.net>
To: "Daniel Hazelton" <dhazelton@...er.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Daniel Hazelton wrote
> If "DRM" was against the license then an extra section clearly
> explaining that could have been added. (in the DRM case I actually
> understand the reasoning and agree with it.)
Changing licenses is not like changing software code, re-licensing is
a major hassle so "release early, release often" is not a viable
strategy.
That means GPL v3 is not a nice localised incremental patch but a huge
patchset on all the issues that have accumulated since GPLv2 was
written (and one can discuss the correctness of parts of this
patchset)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists