linux-kernel - Re: limits on raid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706151823360.32724@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:23:50 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
cc:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, david@...g.hm,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: limits on raid


On Jun 15 2007 14:10, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>Some things are not achievable with block-level raid.  For example, with
>redundancy integrated into the filesystem, you can have three copies for
>metadata, two copies for small files, and parity blocks for large files,
>effectively using different raid levels for different types of data on
>the same filesystem.

Sounds like you want RAIF, not RAID.



	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/