[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070615110326.b0762b7a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:03:26 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
dave young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: coding style
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:54:14 -0600 Chris Friesen wrote:
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all of you for answering. Actually I was concerning about function
> > arguments' alignment (on separated lines) not about indentation. So as I see
> > it's a question of bent ;) And a simple rule exist - use tabs for indents
> > and spaces for alignment (when amount of spaces are < 8).
>
> That rule doesn't actually work though, an is imposed by tools limitations.
>
> Consider two people, one with tabs as 8 characters and one with tabs as
> 4 characters. If person A aligns using a tab plus a space (giving 9
> characters), then the alignmnet will be all screwed up for person B (who
> will see 5 characters of alignment).
>
> The only rule that works (setting aside bad tools) is:
>
> "use tabs for indents and spaces for alignment"
>
> If that means you need to use two dozen spaces, then so be it.
I don't think that's what that rule means, but I didn't write it,
so I'm not absolutely sure about it.
but we know that tab stops are every 8th character, not 4 :)
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists