[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706151319430.14121@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
dave young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: coding style
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> |
> | from CodingStyle:
> | Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8
> | characters. There are heretic movements that try to make
> | indentations 4 (or even 2!) characters deep, and that is akin
> | to trying to define the value of PI to be 3.
> |
> | Linus (did he wrote that part?) and the heretics both can have their fun
> | without impacting each other. If we wanted to force the user to have
> | exactly 8 screen blanks, we should use spaces throughout.
I did indeed write that.
Tabs are 8 characters in the kernel coding style.
And yes, I also wrote the other quote:
> Dunno who wrote that part :(. Jan, look:
>
> Now, some people will claim that having 8-character indentations makes
> the code move too far to the right, and makes it hard to read on a
> 80-character terminal screen. The answer to that is that if you need
> more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix
> your program.
and I think that's in many ways even more important than the 8-character
tab, because deep indentation is unreadable even if you *can* fit it on a
single line.
In the kernel, we try to split functions up, and perhaps use inline
functions etc, and really really avoid deep indentation.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists