[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <orlkelx807.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:44:40 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 15, 2007, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> So, you see, your statement above, about wanting to be able to use
>> other people's improvements, cannot be taken without qualification.
> No. Linus and other Linux kernels might *want* to take other people's
> improvements, but thanks to Richard Stallman's choices for GPLv3, they
> can *not* legally take other people's improvements without violating
> the GPLv3 license.
This argument is backwards. It's because of Linus' choice for GPLv2
that he can't take improvements under the GPLv3.
Had he chosen any other GPLv3-compatible license, he could.
And the same applies to any other incompatible pair of licenses.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists