linux-kernel - Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070615220544.GA18509@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:05:44 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
	Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
	Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> > And the preamble, not being part of the active portion of the 
> > license, has absolutely *ZERO* bearing.
> 
> That's not true. Again, ianal, etc etc, but:
> 
> "Intent" *does* matter, and if you wrote down the intent at the time 
> you entered some legal agreement, that actually also has non-zero 
> bearing (as it can be used to _show_ intent more clearly than claiming 
> fifteen years later "but, your honour, I _intended_ to do something 
> else").

yeah. What comes up periodically in GPLv3 discussions as 'proof' of what 
the GPL means are totally detached statements of the FSF and of RMS, 
often written a decade _after_ the GPL has been chosen for a license of 
the Linux kernel. (the whole anti-Tivo line was invented well after the 
fact.) And those statements have little bearing on the interpretation of 
the license of GPL-ed works. (unless, of course, the author of a GPL-ed 
work agrees with those statements and intends them to be his 
interpretation of the license.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/