[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706160123.55636.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:23:55 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@...ebsd.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make the IDE DMA timeout modifiable
On Tuesday 12 June 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >>On Feb 20, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> >>>On Wednesday 21 February 2007 02:19, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
>
> >>>>It can be changed via /proc/ide/hd?/settings.
>
> >>>Why do we need to change IDE DMA timeout dynamically?
>
> >>I've used it to test error recovery (for example).
>
> > Seems quite useable for developers but I would prefer not to
> > expose it in production kernels for end users.
>
> It seems that I have counter example of a customer asking if this timeout
> can be done configurable. :-)
May I ask what was the rationale for this request?
I have no strong feelings about adding this /proc/ide/ setting but I worry
that it could be (mis)used just to (unreliably) work-around problems...
> BTW, why the timeout is so damn long? 2*WAIT_CMD is 20 secs, and if DMA is
> not complete or interrupt pending, it may wait 10 more secs...
I really don't remember... :)
Maybe Mark or Alan could help with figuring this out.
Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists