linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] V4L: stk11xx, add a new webcam driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4673D264.8090306@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2007 14:07:00 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Thierry Merle <thierry.merle@...e.fr>
CC:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	video4linux-list@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] V4L: stk11xx, add a new webcam driver

Thierry Merle napsal(a):
> Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 à 23:08 +0200, Jiri Slaby a écrit :
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Em SÃ¡b, 2007-06-02 Ã s 11:00 +0200, Thierry Merle escreveu:
>>>> Nevertheless, I will start to specify the framework.
>>>> The helper daemon would link to the v4l2-apps/lib.
>>> Ok, thanks!
>> Ok, here comes updated version of stk11xx driver. Note that it's not
>> still
>> separated into more files (I'll do this as the last step) and also
>> resize
>> and bayer->rgb conversion remains. This is what I'm interested in --
>> is
>> there some embryo of library with resize and conversion? Or what was
>> the
>> decision to create?
> 
> Hi Jiri,
> sorry I started the specification but nothing finalized (and
> consequently no code).
> Here is the start of my idea for a v4l2_extension:
> http://thierry.merle.free.fr/v4l2_extension/general.html
> My new USB tuner took me all my little time and I did not get into
> details (the spec is incomplete).
> Well, as you insist I will explain a bit more :)
> Please comment, tell me what you don't understand I will try to update
> during this week-end...

At the first look seems good, the SD is self-explaining. If you want me to help
you with something, feel free to drop a message ;).

In the meantime until some early increment would be developped, is it
feasible/acceptable to merge the driver as is (after changing some things which
will be eventually commented plus splitting into several files)?

thanks,
-- 
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/            Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8  22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/