linux-kernel - Re: coding style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46742130.6010409@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:43:12 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	gorcunov@...il.com
CC:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	dave young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, apw@...dowen.org,
	jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: coding style

gorcunov@...il.com wrote:
> [Stefan Richter - Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:07:43PM +0200]
> | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> | > There sould be someting making strict rule over alignment (as it done
> | > for the tabs size).
> | 
> | That's impracticable.  Alignment, as it serves readability, cannot be
> | covered by a few strict rules.

> Yes, but C syntax (and grammar) is limited set. And alignmet I'm talking
> about may cover the following statements only:
> 
> 1) Mathematical
> 2) Logical
> 3) Function's arguments

Sure, but we have sometimes long names and long ./-> dereference
expressions.  Alignment of those after line wraps sometimes turns out
better if 'taste' rather than a simple rule is applied.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -==- =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/