| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m3tzt7u1ro.fsf@maximus.localdomain> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:39:55 +0200 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@...o.cam.ac.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>, Sean <seanlkml@...patico.ca>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm, Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@...o.cam.ac.uk> writes: > So you have to give recipients the license text from a particular > version of the GPL. To make that the only version unde which the work > is licensed, you have to add something like "Licensed under the > GPLv2". Otherwise sec. 9 says that you offer the work under any > version of the GPL, and the licensee can take his or her pick -- even > using v1 (!). That's exactly what I meant by "not specifying the version". -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists