[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ord4zwu13c.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:42:15 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: Florin Malita <fmalita@...il.com>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Jun 15, 2007, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> On Friday 15 June 2007 15:28:29 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Jun 15, 2007, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:25:57 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> >> Is the signature not derived from the bits in the GPLed component, as
>> >> much as it is derived from the key?
>> > Actually, you can't copyright, trademark, or patent a number.
>> Agreed. And this counter-argument of yours is a distraction.
>> I was careful to not talk about "derived work".
> "Is the signature not derived from X as much as it is derived from Y."
> "I was careful to not talk about "derived work"."
> Which personality of yours am I currently addressing?
The one that speaks English, not Legalese. IANAL.
Last I looked it up, "derived" was a plain-English word.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists