| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7b69d1470706152251r60a8b060yd757c62b7bfe6e6b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:51:46 -0500 From: "Scott Preece" <sepreece@...il.com> To: tim.post@...kinetics.net Cc: "Alexandre Oliva" <aoliva@...hat.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rob Landley" <rob@...dley.net>, "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, "Daniel Hazelton" <dhazelton@...er.net>, "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>, "debian developer" <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm, "Tarkan Erimer" <tarkan@...one.net.tr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 On 6/15/07, Tim Post <tim.post@...kinetics.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 19:52 -0500, Scott Preece wrote: > > > > > Yes, but in highlighting the possibility of evil intentions you > > distort the fact that usually there are no such evil intentions... > > > > I don't think you can use "usually" and "fact" together like that. Why > is it so bad to account for them since they (do) surface and (could) > increase significantly in frequency? --- I agree that it is possible to have different definitions of "evil" and "ethical"... scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists