linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1181982701.25228.615.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 16 Jun 2007 09:31:41 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types

On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 23:22 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > For the architecture we use (Blackfin), it does not support unaligned
> > accesses, and we purposely never put in the trap/fixup code - we trap, and
> > printk("fix your source");
> 
> For the kernel you should fix up too in addition to the printk. Otherwise
> you risk a ping of death in the field with some more obscure protocol.
> Also the printk should be load limited.

Sometimes you can't. Some architectures don't even take a trap, and on
others (FR-V without MMU) it's an imprecise exception.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/