lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 17 Jun 2007 02:55:52 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <>
To:	Michal Piotrowski <>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <>,
	Stefan Richter <>,
	Oleg Verych <>,
	Linus Torvalds <>,
	Andi Kleen <>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <>,
	Diego Calleja <>,
	Chuck Ebbert <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  (Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21))

On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:41:36 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <> wrote:

> +If the patch introduces a new regression and this regression was not fixed
> +in seven days, then the patch will be reverted.

Those regressions where we know which patch caused them are the easy ones.
Often we don't know which patch (or even which subsystem merge) is at

I think.  How many of the present 2.6.22-rc regressions which you're
presently tracking have such a well-identified cause?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists