linux-kernel - Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070617174350.GA5776@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date:	Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:43:50 +0400
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	david@...g.hm
Cc:	Gabor Czigola <czigola@...il.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 10:29:57AM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Gabor Czigola wrote:
> >I wonder why the linux kernel development community couldn't propose
> >an own GPL draft (say v2.2) that is "as free as v2" and that includes
> >some ideas (from v3) that are considered as good (free, innovative, in
> >the spirit of whatever etc.) by the majority of the kernel developers.
> >
> >I guess to have an own version of the GPL license could also help to
> >resolve (future) dual-licensing problems.

Similar (in spirit) idea recently arose on a different mailing list.
The answer was:

	That's a great idea.  Maybe Henning should write all this stuff up,
	instead of making pf faster.

	Let's do more shit-work, so that we have less time to improve the code.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/