[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070617193356.GB20727@alinoe.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel?
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:18:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> where n is a number that needs to be determined (I think that n could be 3).
> Well, "negative comments" should also be defined more precisely. ;-)
I think that n should be a function of the number of accepted patches
that this person sent in before, and the number of regressions he
caused in the past.
Ie, new developers have to wait a considerable amount of time - while
experienced developers who never caused a regression should be able
to write patches that are immediately applied. Also, if anyone causes
a regression - that would lead to them having to wait longer the
next time before they can apply the patch - a good reason for a
developer to put extra time into making sure there are no regressions.
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists