[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070617211338.GA24771@alinoe.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:13:38 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric@...olt.net, zhenyu.z.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 04:49:04PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> That's pretty bad corruption indeed. What I'm puzzling over though
> is why other 965G users aren't seeing the same thing.
> My own 965G seems to be fine, though that's using Intel graphics
> instead of nvidia.
>
> (Just to rule it out, I'm assuming at this stage in boot that the
> nvidia driver module has never been loaded?)
Doesn't even exist for that kernel. I only compiled a new
nvidia driver module for one kernel - the one that I am using
on a daily basis.
> And if you never load the agpgart modules, you never see lockups?
What would the name be of such module?
In fact, I think that when the kernel does NOT lockup, it
doesn't print this "agpgart: Detected.." line either.
Ie, the dmesg of cf68676222e54cd0a31efd968da00e65f9a0963f
which boots fine, gives:
$ grep Detected dmesg-cf686
time.c: Detected 2666.669 MHz processor.
Detected 16.666 MHz APIC timer.
$ grep agpgart dmesg-cf686
Linux agpgart interface v0.102 (c) Dave Jones
Does that give an indication of what you want me to test/try?
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists