| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:13:38 +0200 From: Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com> To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric@...olt.net, zhenyu.z.wang@...el.com Subject: Re: [AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 04:49:04PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > That's pretty bad corruption indeed. What I'm puzzling over though > is why other 965G users aren't seeing the same thing. > My own 965G seems to be fine, though that's using Intel graphics > instead of nvidia. > > (Just to rule it out, I'm assuming at this stage in boot that the > nvidia driver module has never been loaded?) Doesn't even exist for that kernel. I only compiled a new nvidia driver module for one kernel - the one that I am using on a daily basis. > And if you never load the agpgart modules, you never see lockups? What would the name be of such module? In fact, I think that when the kernel does NOT lockup, it doesn't print this "agpgart: Detected.." line either. Ie, the dmesg of cf68676222e54cd0a31efd968da00e65f9a0963f which boots fine, gives: $ grep Detected dmesg-cf686 time.c: Detected 2666.669 MHz processor. Detected 16.666 MHz APIC timer. $ grep agpgart dmesg-cf686 Linux agpgart interface v0.102 (c) Dave Jones Does that give an indication of what you want me to test/try? -- Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists