[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070617080814.GB5440@brong.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:08:14 +1000
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 02:38:43AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net> wrote:
>
> > Ah, but giving the user half the key doesn't mean they still don't have access
> > to the entire key. QED: Giving people half the key won't cut it under the
> > GPLv3 (dd4)
>
> I meant really giving, rather than giving a copy, or giving the
> original and keeping a copy.
>
> You could make it require a pair of signatures, one from the vendor,
> that the vendor keeps, one from the user, that the vendor never sees,
> too. Like some bank PINs, it gets generated, used to generate some
> hash (the signature for the initial installation), printed in an
> envelope for you and stored in the package along with the machine. Or
> something like that.
Wow, and I thought losing a microsoft "certificate of authenticity" and
associated key was a pain. Ouch. Talk about your paper "dongle".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists