[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46749AA2.4030608@wolfmountaingroup.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:21:22 -0600
From: "Jeffrey V. Merkey" <jmerkey@...fmountaingroup.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
>
>>No, I'm arguing that it's not "mere aggregation" - the kernel is useless
>>on that machine unless the BIOS is present or replaced with something
>>else with equivalent functionality.
>>
>>
>
>That's *not* a valid argument!
>
>
>
Linus,
Just take a vote and start tagging files and ignore this needless
diatribe. It is was it is, I seriously doubt you will
get all of Linux moved to GPL3 as a monolith, since you will never get
concensus. You should fork a GPL3 kernel and let people decide
whether their code goes in or not. If they don't want to move to it, new
people can contribute new code. Start a 2.8 tree or whatever that is
GPL3 only.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists