[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1I0ChN-0006nd-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:34:57 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: mingo@...e.hu
CC: cebbert@...hat.com, chris@...ee.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kiran@...lex86.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60
> > > This change causes the memory access of the "easy" spin-loop portion
> > > to be more agressive: after the REP; NOP we'd not do the 'easy-loop'
> > > with a simple CMPB, but we'd re-attempt the atomic op.
> >
> > It looks as if this is going to overflow of the lock counter, no?
>
> hm, what do you mean? There's no lock counter.
I mean, the repeated calls to decb will pretty soon make lock->slock
wrap around.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists