[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706180623280.11972@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 06:25:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Denis Cheng <crquan@...il.com>
cc: trivial@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial: the memset operation on a automatic array
variable should be optimized out by data initialization
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Denis Cheng wrote:
> From: Denis Cheng <crquan@...il.com>
>
> the explicit memset call could be optimized out by data initialization,
> thus all the fill working can be done by the compiler implicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@...il.com>
>
> ---
> Is there some comments on this?
>
> --- arch/x86_64/mm/init.c.orig 2007-06-07 10:08:04.000000000 +0800
> +++ arch/x86_64/mm/init.c 2007-06-18 14:43:15.000000000 +0800
> @@ -406,8 +406,7 @@ void __cpuinit zap_low_mappings(int cpu)
> #ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
> void __init paging_init(void)
> {
> - unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> - memset(max_zone_pfns, 0, sizeof(max_zone_pfns));
> + unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0, };
the drawback i see to this is that it's *visually* misleading. it
*appears* that what the programmer is trying to do is just initialize
the first element, not all of them -- regardless of the actual effect.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists