[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070618131157.GA23229@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:11:57 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@...ibm.com>
Cc: holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
gregkh@...e.de, mtk-manpages@....net, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
"lf_kernel_messages@...ux-foundation.org"
<lf_kernel_messages@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:42:15AM -0700, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
>
> Andrew mentioned a mechanism for adding a subsystem tag or other tag
> which helps disambiguate the message, either in the message file or in
> the end user documentation (e.g. the Message Pedia/mPedia that the Japanese
> have already created with ~350 messages, and a total of ~700 targetted
> by the end of the year).
>
> That tag could be appended to the beginning of the printk, to the end of
> the printk, or even in a formatted comment at the end of the printk that
> the tool could extract.
The best way to maintain such a subsystem tag most be supported by
kbuild. So say we have the subsystem "scsi" then we can set this subsystem
tag in drivers/scsi/Makefile and let drivers/scsi/arm/Makefile inherit
this vaule doing nothing.
Addign the subsystem tag to the printk could than be done using the
C preprocessor and we are all fine.
If we go by the kernel-doc way to document kernel messages (the few that
actually needs additional explanation) then we need to teach kernel-doc
to collect the same subsystem tag but that should be doable.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists