| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200706181715.15017.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:15:14 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Uli Luckas <u.luckas@...d.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] PM: Disable usermode helper before hibernation and suspend
On Monday, 18 June 2007 12:51, Uli Luckas wrote:
> On Sunday, 17. June 2007, you wrote:
> > On Friday, 15 June 2007 23:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 15 June 2007 15:08, Uli Luckas wrote:
> > > > On Monday, 4. June 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > > > >
> > > > > Use a hibernation and suspend notifier to disable the user mode
> > > > > helper before a hibernation/suspend and enable it after the
> > > > > operation.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Rafael,
> > > > I have a couple of questions, regarding this patch ...
>
> > > > 2) how does your patch prevent wait_for_completion(&done) to hang
> > > > during freezing if usermodehelper_pm_callback is called _after_ the
> > > > above check?
> > >
> > > It doesn't. Once the helper is running, we can't distinguish it from any
> > > other user land process.
> > >
> > > Still, it narrows the window quite a bit.
> >
> > Okay, I think we can help it a bit. Please tell me what you think of the
> > following patch (on top of 2.6.22-rc4-mm2).
> >
> Hi Rafael,
> Thanks for your work. I haven't found the time to actually test your patch but
> in general it looks like a valid aproach.
> I think there is one problem though. You need to have your wait queue woken up
> when you update (atomic_dec) running_helpers. Otherwise you end up always
> waiting the full RUNNING_HELPERS_TIMEOUT.
Yeah, right. I tend to forget about obvious things. :-(
Besides, I think that the _pm_callback need not be compiled if CONFIG_PM is
unset. If you can, please have a look at the next version of the patch (appended).
Greetings,
Rafael
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/kmod.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/kernel/kmod.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -41,14 +41,6 @@ extern int max_threads;
static struct workqueue_struct *khelper_wq;
-/*
- * If set, both call_usermodehelper_keys() and call_usermodehelper_pipe() exit
- * immediately returning -EBUSY. Used for preventing user land processes from
- * being created after the user land has been frozen during a system-wide
- * hibernation or suspend operation.
- */
-static int usermodehelper_disabled;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_KMOD
/*
@@ -275,6 +267,30 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+/*
+ * If set and if call_usermodehelper_exec() is supposed to wait, it will exit
+ * immediately returning -EBUSY (used for preventing user land processes from
+ * being created after the user land has been frozen during a system-wide
+ * hibernation or suspend operation).
+ */
+static int usermodehelper_disabled;
+
+/* Number of helpers running */
+static atomic_t running_helpers = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
+/*
+ * Wait queue head used by usermodehelper_pm_callback() to wait for all running
+ * helpers to finish.
+ */
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(running_helpers_waitq);
+
+/*
+ * Time to wait for running_helpers to become zero before the setting of
+ * usermodehelper_disabled in usermodehelper_pm_callback() fails
+ */
+#define RUNNING_HELPERS_TIMEOUT (5 * HZ)
+
static int usermodehelper_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action,
void *ignored)
@@ -283,7 +299,15 @@ static int usermodehelper_pm_callback(st
case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
usermodehelper_disabled = 1;
- return NOTIFY_OK;
+ wait_event_timeout(running_helpers_waitq,
+ atomic_read(&running_helpers) == 0,
+ RUNNING_HELPERS_TIMEOUT);
+ if (atomic_read(&running_helpers) == 0) {
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+ } else {
+ usermodehelper_disabled = 0;
+ return NOTIFY_BAD;
+ }
case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
usermodehelper_disabled = 0;
@@ -293,6 +317,36 @@ static int usermodehelper_pm_callback(st
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
+static void new_helper(void)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&running_helpers);
+}
+
+static void helper_finished(void)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&running_helpers))
+ wake_up(&running_helpers_waitq);
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_PM */
+#define usermodehelper_disabled 0
+
+static inline int usermodehelper_pm_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+ unsigned long action,
+ void *ignored)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void new_helper(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void helper_finished(void)
+{
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+
/**
* call_usermodehelper_setup - prepare to call a usermode helper
* @path - path to usermode executable
@@ -397,12 +451,13 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subp
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
int retval;
+ new_helper();
if (sub_info->path[0] == '\0') {
retval = 0;
goto out;
}
- if (!khelper_wq || usermodehelper_disabled) {
+ if (!khelper_wq || (wait != UMH_NO_WAIT && usermodehelper_disabled)) {
retval = -EBUSY;
goto out;
}
@@ -418,6 +473,7 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subp
out:
call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info);
+ helper_finished();
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_usermodehelper_exec);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists