[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070618180327.GP10008@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:03:27 -0400
From: lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Brendan Conoboy <blc@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Wakko Warner <wakko@...mx.eu.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: limits on raid
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:28:38AM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> I plan to test the different configurations.
>
> however, if I was saturating the bus with the reconstruct how can I fire
> off a dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test and get ~45M/sec whild only slowing the
> reconstruct to ~4M/sec?
>
> I'm putting 10x as much data through the bus at that point, it would seem
> to proove that it's not the bus that's saturated.
dd 45MB/s from the raid sounds reasonable.
If you have 45 drives, doing a resync of raid5 or radi6 should probably
involve reading all the disks, and writing new parity data to one drive.
So if you are writing 5MB/s, then you are reading 44*5MB/s from the
other drives, which is 220MB/s. If your resync drops to 4MB/s when
doing dd, then you have 44*4MB/s which is 176MB/s or 44MB/s less read
capacity, which surprisingly seems to match the dd speed you are
getting. Seems like you are indeed very much saturating a bus
somewhere. The numbers certainly agree with that theory.
What kind of setup is the drives connected to?
--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists