linux-kernel - Re: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070618184436.GC17479@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:44:36 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	johannes@...solutions.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	hs4233@...l.mn-solutions.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: libertas (private) ioctls vs. nl80211

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:38:47PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:13 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I suspect that the probability of your proposal succeeding would be increased
> > > if you could prepare a patch...
> 
> Applied to upstream-fixes branch of libertas-2.6 which is destined for
> 2.6.22; I hope you don't mind that I just added the Signed-off-by for
> you.

Adding a signed off line for a patch that purely removes codes seems
rather pointless to me, but feel free to add it if you care.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/