lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:12:05 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	trenn@...e.de
Cc:	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation - How to debug ACPI Problems


> +2. Overriding DSDT
> +------------------
> +
> +The DSDT (there is a patch also for SSDTs) can be overridden by the user.
> +The tables get copied to RAM when booting and the kernel can override them with
> +alternative tables at early boot time.
> +
> +Historically people used to override their DSDT to workaround BIOS or even
> +kernel bugs. This is a bad idea, the override functionality is for short
> +term workarounds and mainly for debugging! Please always report such bugs to
> +bugzilla.kernel.org or post to linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org if unsure.
> +
> +There are two possibilities to override the DSDT:
> +
> +  - via CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT (and _FILE) compile option(s)
> +  - via adding a customized DSDT into initramfs
> +
> +The second approach does not need kernel recompilation and some distributions
> +provide the patch, which is not included in mainline, in their kernels.
> +
> +The patch and more information can be found here (many thanks to Markus
> +Gaugusch and Eric Piel):
> +http://gaugusch.at/kernel.shtml
> +

how to override the DSDT by re-compiling the upstream kernel
is already documented here:

http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/README.ACPI

It seems inconsistent to refer to the initrd patch from the in-tree Documentation,
since that patch will always be out-of-tree.

I would think that the in-tree Documentation would refer to specifics relating
to the kernel that is actually checked into the tree with the Documentation.
This assumption can probably clear up some of the wording relating to the
debug flags -- we don't have to describe the old ones -- if somebody is
reading this documentation, they already have the new ones:-)

Asside from those specific things that describe the kernel in the tree,
I'm thinking that acpi.sourceforge.net documentation would be a better
place for a general HOWTO on debugging ACPI issues in general.

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ