[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070618194813.GA11691@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:48:13 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:20:39PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2007, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > From the very _beginning_ of the v3 process the kernel developers
> > have showed their objection to that section of the license, and we
> > were told, to our face, with no uncertian terms, that it was going
> > to stay, in one form or another, no matter what we thought or said
> > about it.
>
> This sounds about right.
>
> > So, why would we want to waste our time filling out web forms after
> > that?
>
> If you're adamantly favorable to permitting any form of Tivoization
> whatsoever, don't bother.
For the record, I completely feel that what Tivo did was both legally
correct[1], and the correct thing to do for their system, and would
fight _very_ hard any attempt to change the Linux kernel's license that
would prevent this usage model.
So I will not bother anymore.
greg k-h
[1] The FSF lawyers also agree with this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists