[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKEEEFELAC.davids@webmaster.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:59:24 -0700
From: "David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com>
To: <david@...g.hm>, "Alexandre Oliva" <aoliva@...hat.com>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
> > But you're not the user of the software on my laptop. I am.
> ahh, but by your own argument you aren't
Let's not confuse owner with user and let's not confuse ownership of
copyrights with ownership of particular copies.
> the software on your laptop is owned by people like Linus, Al Viro, David
> M, Alan Cox, etc.
No. The copyright to the software is owned by those people. But particular
copies of copyrighted items can be owned by other people.
> they have the right to put a license on that software that would require
> you to give them access to your hardware (after all, that's the argument
> that you are useing to justify requireing Tivo to give you access
> to their hardware)
That's right, they do have that right so long as they condition it on the
exercise of something I could not do without their permission. (Ignoring for
the moment the fact that the software is a derivative work of GPL'd
software.)
I'm not sure whether you think this disagrees with or refutes anything I've
said.
DS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists