linux-kernel - Re: GPLv3 dispute solution

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	alan <alan@...eserver.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc:	Joshua David Williams <yurimxpxman.lkml@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPLv3 dispute solution - new open source license?

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Alan Cox wrote:

>> If we can't adopt the GPLv3, it seems obvious to me that we need our own
>> solution.
>
> Its called GPL v2.

Its not the Spirit of the GPLv3 I object to, its the hangover the next 
morning.

Why do I see this horse-shaped hole that people continue to want to hit 
with sticks?

-- 
"ANSI C says access to the padding fields of a struct is undefined.
ANSI C also says that struct assignment is a memcpy. Therefore struct
assignment in ANSI C is a violation of ANSI C..."
                                   - Alan Cox
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/