[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0706181648020.3593@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>
cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> technically, it asks you to pass on (!= give back) access to the
> software (not to the hardware that contains it).
That "technically" is just another way of saying "if you look cross-eyed
at it, and don't look too closely".
> No. The reason, again, is the portion you snipped out.
>
> Could you try again?
No.
Not worth my time. You have shown yourself unable to learn and understand.
Just live with it. The GPLv2 is better for the kernel.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists