[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070619104314.GF17865@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:13:14 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, pwil3058@...pond.net.au,
clameter@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: v2.6.21.4-rt11
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:04:30AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I'm wondering, why did this trigger under CFS and not on mainline?
I thought Paul had seen the same problem with 2.6.21.5. I will try a
more recent mainline (2.6.22-rc5 maybe) after I get hold of the problem
machine and report later today.
If there is any difference, it should be because of the reported topology
by low-level platform code. In the problem case, each CPU was being reported
to be a separate node (CONFIG_NUMA enabled) which caused idle_balance()
to stop load-balance lookups at cpu/node level itself.
> Mainline seems to have a similar problem in idle_balance() too, or am i
> misreading it?
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists