[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070619213927.AC83.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:54:47 +0900
From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, clameter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Introduce a means of compacting memory within a zone
Hi Mel-san.
This is very interesting feature.
Now, I'm testing your patches.
> +static int isolate_migratepages(struct zone *zone,
> + struct compact_control *cc)
> +{
> + unsigned long high_pfn, low_pfn, end_pfn, start_pfn;
(snip)
> + /* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> + for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
> + if (!pfn_valid_within(low_pfn))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Get the page and skip if free */
> + page = pfn_to_page(low_pfn);
I met panic at here on my tiger4.
I compiled with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM. So, CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is not set.
pfn_valid_within() returns 1 every time on this configuration.
(This config is for only virtual memmap)
But, my tiger4 box has memory holes in normal zone.
When it is changed to normal pfn_valid(), no panic occurs.
Hmmm.
Bye.
--
Yasunori Goto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists