[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070619150502.GO5836@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:05:02 -0500
From: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: Stuart_Hayes@...l.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
Hi Sergei,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 06:07:07PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>
> Stuart_Hayes@...l.com wrote:
> >I think reading the IDE status register clears the interrupt in the IDE
> >device, which might be causing the drive to think it's OK to generate
> >another interrupt.
>
> This is not how IDE drives are supposed to act -- they won't proceed any
> further until "interrupt pending" condition is cleared, so these aren't
> supposed to be "stacked". This behavior however is not strictly specified
> by ATA standards IIRC, but I can't readily imagine such situaltion anyway
> unless tagged command queueing (which is not supported by IDE core) and/or
> ATAPI command overlapping is in action...
The problem only manifests during high io load; perhaps a missing mutex
somewhere is blasting one thing too many out to the hard drive?
> > This could either cause it to get stuck trying to
> >service an interrupt that is never getting cleared as you suggested, or
> >possibly when the next IRQ comes in the IDE IRQ handler gets stuck
> >waiting for a spinlock that the code you're looking at already owns...?
>
> I could also imagine the HPT366 chip going mad and stalling the reads if
> the taskfile regs forever because of the incomplete DMA or even the drive
> going mad and not replying to I/O cycles with proper -IORDY handshake (i.e.
> holding it low all the time)...
In my case, ctrl-alt-sysrq doesn't work, which makes it hard to debug.
I'm thinking that trying to debug libata is a better idea, rather than
investing time in ide, right? Although at the moment, libata works even
less; see other email.
--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists