[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200706192333.09183.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:33:08 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pavel@....cz,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optional Beeping During Resume From Suspend To Ram.
Hi Nigel,
On Tuesday, 19 June 2007 13:18, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Here's what I have after today's work.
>
> I haven't yet been able to test on x86, but can confirm that it works okay on
> x86_64. I'm currently working towards testing it on my old Omnibook. My P4
> desktop won't resume from suspend to ram at all, and hasn't produced any
> beeps.
>
> I needed to move the BEEP invocation to after the data segment is reloaded,
> so that the test could access the variable. That was pretty tricky to find -
> no oops or anything bad prior, it just didn't beep when expected.
>
> A couple of notes:
>
> - I'd like to put the BEEP macro somewhere that can be shared by x86 32 and
> 64. If that's a good idea, any suggestions on where? Nothing occurs to me
> straight off.
I don't know either. I think Andi is the right person to ask (CC added).
> - I've just switched from Evo to Kmail. Please let me know if there's any
> mangling of the patch.
The patch looks good to me. I'll try to run it on an i386 tomorrow.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists